|
Talking
Points on HR 2036:
Children's
Defense Act of 1999
Contact
your representative
I.
H.R. 2036 could imprison booksellers for selling First
Amendment-protected books.
Under H.R. 2036, a
bookseller can be sent to jail for up to five years for selling a minor under
the age of 17 a book or magazine that contains pictures, photographs or drawings
or detailed verbal descriptions or narrative accounts of explicit sexual or
violent material. These books and magazines are protected by the First
Amendment. Although many states
have laws forbidding the sale to minors of sexually explicit material, the
courts have consistently ruled that banning the sale of violent material to
minors is unconstitutional because it is impossible to define violence in a way
that prevents access to gratuitous and exploitative depictions
without also preventing minors from obtaining works that deal seriously with the
subject of violence.
II.
H.R. 2036 would prevent minors from obtaining anti-violent and other
important works.
Although there is a
three-part test for harmfulness, most booksellers would not try to decide
for themselves whether a particular book is covered by the law.
To avoid five years in jail, they would simply refuse to sell minors any
books with violent content, including those that are anti-violent or anti-war
like Stephen Cranes Red Badge of Courage or Erich Maria Remarques All
Quiet on the Western Front. According
to the American Library Association, books with violent content are challenged
frequently in libraries and schools around the country.
In 1997-1998, they included Maya
Angelou, I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, John C. Gardner, Grendel,
Robert M. Lipsyte, One Fat Summer, Walter Dean Myers, Fallen Angles,
John Steinbeck, The Red Pony, Alice Walker, The Color Purple, and
Richard Wright, Native Son.
III.
The media do not contribute significantly to the level of violence in the
United States.
The role of the media
in causing violence is controversial. While
there are many studies that claim that TV violence causes increased levels of
aggressiveness in some test subjects, the National Research Council did not
consider the media a significant problem in its 1993 study, Understanding and
Preventing Violence. The NRC, the principal operating agency of the National
Academy of Sciences, devoted chapters to the role of drugs and alcohol, violence
in the family and firearms but not to the role of media.
In a book of 354 pages, it gave the issue only four paragraphs.
III.
Government censorship is far more dangerous than the worst book or movie
Like
all Americans, booksellers were deeply shocked by the Columbine High School
shootings and passionately wish to see the level of violence in our society
reduced. However, they fear that efforts to achieve this by censoring books and
other media will undermine free speech. When
government attempts to suppress even hateful ideas, it threatens democracy
itself.
|