|
ABFFE Book of the
Month:
Books on Trial: Red Scare in the Heartland by Shirley A.
Wiegand and Wayne A. Wiegand
Interview with
the Authors

Q:
How did you discover the incident that inspired you to collaborate on
Books on Trial?
A:
The project began when Wayne spotted a
one-paragraph article in a 1940 issue of Wilson Library Bulletin
that reported the conviction of an Oklahoma City bookseller for
violating a state criminal syndicalism law. The defendant in the trial
had been brought to “justice” not for anything he did, but for the
content of the books he sold. Because Wayne was very interested in
censorship issues in American library and book history, and because of
Shirl’s litigation background and familiarity with Oklahoma law, he
suggested to her that this had the makings of a good article they could
coauthor. In the course of our research, we discovered that the story we
initially thought was minor had actually received national attention in
the early 1940s but had been overwhelmed by the United States’ entry
into World War II, and subsequently disappeared entirely from the pages
of history. After interviewing surviving witnesses to the events and
relatives of participants, poring over trial transcripts and appellate
records, and analyzing thousands of pages obtained from FBI files
through Freedom of Information Act requests, five years later we had
enough information for a book.
Q:
Why should readers care about events that happened so long ago in
Oklahoma City?
A:
The events in the early 1940s
represent just one example of government over-reaction to perceived
threats. Parallels clearly exist between Oklahoma at mid-century and the
paranoid politics of other periods in American history, beginning in the
1790s with America’s near-war with France, and reemerging in the Civil
War, World Wars I and II, throughout the Cold War, in the Vietnam era,
and, of course, today. In the 1940s, Oklahoma officials and their
allies and sympathizers showed a vengeful streak in the book trials that
accelerated an already greatly exaggerated sense of threat to national
security, and brought with it a flagrant disregard for basic civil
liberties. Other government officials have demonstrated similar
reactions, and in times of national crisis, free speech often takes a
hit. Public opinion, however, can have an effect, as this book clearly
demonstrates.
Q:
Does this story offer any new information about government efforts to
suppress dissent?
A:
What’s most interesting about this story is
that it received widespread attention from a variety of sources – big
city and small town newspapers, the publishing industry, libraries and
labor unions, well-known figures like Woody Guthrie, Pete Seeger,
Langston Hughes, Theodore Dreiser, Richard Wright, even first lady
Eleanor Roosevelt – over a period of three years, then disappeared
entirely. No one has researched the sources we were able to unearth:
interviews with people arrested that day, trial and appellate
transcripts, thousands of pages of information provided in response to
Freedom of Information Act requests, and the private correspondence and
other files of the defendants themselves, even including notes sent back
and forth from jail cell to jail cell. This rich mine of information
provides a very personal portrait of those subjected to government
repression in the early 1940s.
Q:
How did you locate the specific individuals featured in your book?
A:
This was the fun part. The Internet is
wonderful. We were able to locate the name of one of our defendants, Eli
Jaffe, by an online search. We wrote him and soon thereafter received a
phone call from his widow, Wilma. As luck would have it, she figured
prominently in the story of the bookstore defendants. Her family was
arrested during the 1940 bookstore raid, and then at 16 years old, she
was left standing alone on an Oklahoma City street. By the time we
located her, Wilma was nearly 80, but her energy and interest was
relentless. Shirl spent several days with her, gathering stories and
details we could not have gotten anywhere else. Shirl also visited Sis
Cunningham, a friend of Wilma’s and another prominent character in this
story, and interviewed her shortly before her death. Wilma also led us
to her brother Orval, now deceased, who was arrested the day of the
raids, and to Timothy Wood, son of Bob and Ina, two of the defendants.
Tim had kept a treasure trove of letters, newspaper clippings, and other
materials his parents had saved. And through a variety of sources, we
were finally able to discover Bob Wood’s real name and background,
something even the FBI was unable to do during the many years it tracked
him. We interviewed the families of the defense attorneys, as well as
the families of all the defendants.
Q:
What did you learn from writing this book?
A:
We were reminded that history often repeats
itself. Especially in the history of book-banning, it seems to repeat
itself with greater frequency. During times of national insecurity,
politicians, government officials and influential people in the private
sector worry about perceived threats to the social order, from which
they primarily benefit. In response, they take measures to suppress what
they believe are the root causes of discontent wherever they find them,
including the books and pamphlets that fix in print the messages they
fear most. In the process they often violate basic civil liberties.
Eventually, the threat passes, and efforts to ban books diminish.
Seldom, however, are the powerful held accountable – except by history.
And that’s what we learned from writing this book. Books on Trial
shows that a few courageous individuals can stand up to the arrogance of
power, and with persistence and tenacity rally others to defend them.
|